One particularly attractive feature is AirPreview. It all makes not just for an effective environment but also for a coding environment that’s attractive, comfortable and easy on the eyes. A wildcard token makes Find and Replace even more effective, and a feature called Coda Pops lets you add colors and gradients as you type. Many of those “essential” features you can find on a number of different text editors but Coda also packs in a number of unique features that aren’t found anywhere else. Coda even lets you move files between servers without leaving the editor. File management is integrated, allowing users to edit files on FTP, SFTP, WebDAV and Amaxon S3 servers. #CODA 2 EDITOR SOFTWARE#The Terminal and MySQL editor are built-in, so you won’t find yourself powering up more software to edit data. (Panic says that feature is in the works.) Highlighting covers a broad range of languages and works at lightning speed. Autocompletion supports custom variables and function names but isn’t yet site-wide. Tag closing is automatic, so no searching for broken syntax. Standout features include Find and Replace editing that works across documents. #CODA 2 EDITOR CODE#A single tabbed window supplies the code editor, but also the FTP client, Web browser and terminal. It’s a complete programming environment with all of the bells and whistles that a coder might want in order to make writing those lines quick and accurate. Panic Inc.’s program, which launched in 2007, might call itself a text editor but there’s little that’s textual about it. #CODA 2 EDITOR SERIES#However, I would much rather have the developer(s) working on important features and functionality than on coding a complex series of settings GUIs and APIs.Coda, and in particular the latest version, Coda 2, is what happens when you start with the idea of keeping things as simple as possible… But then start adding essential little features that make life easier. Doing this without much in the way of easily accessible documentation from a series of hash files (or JSON, or dictionaries, or whatever you’d prefer to call it), isn’t optimal. To get the most of it, you have to make it your own, and in order to do that, you need to tweak a bunch of settings. If I had one gripe with ST2 it would be the configuration time. But it’s lightning fast, powerful, and let’s you get stuff done fast. ST2 is not visually beautiful, let’s face it. Let’s face it, Oracle doesn’t give a crap about anything but pushing their Java agenda, and Java does nothing for me personally. The fact that it’s Ruby module doesn’t work in 7+ brings its stock down a lot. Netbeans obviously isn’t easy to develop for, and their updating SUCKS. It had promise with plugins for LESS, CoffeeScript, JSLint, etc., but they aren’t maintained well. I was close with Netbeans, and still use it occasionally for certain things, but it is too Java-oriented. I see that not as a benefit, but a detriment. Espresso was close to being good, but I honestly think it has the same issues that Coda and other “middleweight” editors have: They aren’t powerful enough to feel like a complete IDE, and aren’t lightweight and quick enough to feel like a good text editor. I’ve worked with Textmate, Taco, Netbeans, Nightmareweaver, Coda, and Espresso, to name a few. Every time I go in, look at the GUI and features, and feel optimistic, and every time I end up fighting with the interface and getting less done. Nothing I have tried has given me the level of productivity that ST2 gives, and I have tried many contenders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |